List of Valid XHTML Sites
April 12, 2008 – 21:46 by Dani Iswara. Words count: 230.Last updated: Monday, January 25, 2010 at 12:21.
These websites and weblogs–only homepage–have passed XHTML (Extensible HyperText Markup Language) validation test based on Validome validator.
Prerequisites:
- Homepage is valid XHTML by Validome (served as
application/xhtml+xml), without any remarks and/or warnings. - May passes CSS validation test profile 2 or 3 based on W3C (World Wide Web Consortium); additional status.
- May passes ATRC Web Checker (Adaptive Technology Resource Centre), web accessibility checker; based on WCAG (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines) 2.0 L2 (level 2); additional status.
- Web/blogs are up-to-date in the last 6 months.
- No spam blogs, p0rn, malicious or other destructive content please.
| Sites | Valid XHTML | CSS | ATRC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life, Jeeps and Web Standards @ The Autistic Cuckoo | XHTML 1.1 | valid | passed |
| Musings | XHTML 1.1 + MathML 2.0 + SVG 1.1 | valid | 5 problems |
| PIEN: art and antiques | XHTML 1.1 | valid | passed |
| Sam Kauffmann | XHTML 1.0 Strict | valid | passed |
| sidesh0w.com | XHTML 1.1 | valid | passed |
Notes:
- Some websites are listed on List of XHTML Sites (the X-Philes).
- Some CSS properties and values doesn’t exist in CSS level 2.1 but exists in [css3] or [css2].
Congratulations.. 
Comment by Brian Kaldenberg on April 15, 2009 at 22:53:23
using Internet Explorer 7.0 on Windows Vista
We do all of our websites in Strict XHTML 1.0.
Comment by Dani Iswara on April 16, 2009 at 01:16:23
using Mozilla Firefox 3.0.8 on Gentoo Linux
Brian,
thanks for your information, but Validome returned some remarks on it.
Comment by alex mike on November 4, 2009 at 17:01:46
using Mozilla Firefox 3.5.4 on Windows XP
SangeetPk its a big site and its pure div based valid xhtml site. http://www.sangeetpk.com
Its a nice example since they used div for tabular data. Guy must check it out.
Comment by Dani Iswara on November 4, 2009 at 20:41:40
using Mozilla Firefox 3.5.4 on openSUSE Linux
alex mike,
thanks for the submission. But based on SangeetPk against Validome, the homepage is not valid XHTML 1.1. There are 2 errors with some remarks and warnings.