List of Valid XHTML Sites
Posted: April 12, 2008 at 21:46:13 by Dani Iswara. Words count: 247.
Last updated: August 6, 2010 at 01:33:26.
- Homepage is valid XHTML by Validome (served as
application/xhtml+xml), without any remarks and/or warnings, except in some cases. Since Validome is always out of order, response header will be checked manually. Validate by W3C is enough. - May passes CSS validation test profile 2 or 3 based on W3C (World Wide Web Consortium); additional status.
- May passes ATRC Web Checker (Adaptive Technology Resource Centre), web accessibility checker; based on WCAG (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines) 2.0 L2 (level 2); additional status.
- Web/blogs are up-to-date in the last 6 months.
- No spam blogs, p0rn, malicious or other destructive content please.
| Sites | Valid XHTML | CSS | ATRC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Musings | XHTML 1.1 + MathML 2.0 + SVG 1.1 | valid | 5 problems |
| PIEN: art and antiques | XHTML 1.1 | valid | passed |
| Rebuilding The Web | XHTML 1.1 | valid | passed |
| Sam Kauffmann | XHTML 1.0 Strict | valid | passed |
| sidesh0w.com | XHTML 1.1 | valid | passed |
- Some websites are listed on List of XHTML Sites (the X-Philes).
- Some CSS properties and values doesn't exist in CSS level 2.1 but exists in [css3] or [css2].
Comment by Brian Kaldenberg on April 15, 2009 at 22:53:23
using Internet Explorer 7.0 on Windows Vista
We do all of our websites in Strict XHTML 1.0.
Comment by Dani Iswara on April 16, 2009 at 01:16:23
using Firefox 3.0.8 on Gentoo
Brian,
thanks for your information, but Validome returned some remarks on it.
Comment by alex mike on November 4, 2009 at 17:01:46
using Firefox 3.5.4 on Windows XP
SangeetPk its a big site and its pure div based valid xhtml site. http://www.sangeetpk.com
Its a nice example since they used div for tabular data. Guy must check it out.
Comment by Dani Iswara on November 4, 2009 at 20:41:40
using Firefox 3.5.4 on SuSE
alex mike,
thanks for the submission. But based on SangeetPk against Validome, the homepage is not valid XHTML 1.1. There are 2 errors with some remarks and warnings.