Comparison of Web Accessibility
May 2, 2008 – 8:59 am by Dani IswaraThis is only a comparison of web accessibility on some websites using online validators. I chose 4 sample websites (subjective). They came from first and second search result pages based on keyword web accessibility.
The key of accessibility is universal design = universal access.
The online tools:
- WAVE
- Cynthia Says (WAI / WCAG and Section 508)
- ATRC Web Accessibility Checker
We can add accessibility tools on web developer.
| Sites | WAVE | Cynthia Says (WCAG) | Cynthia Says (Section 508) | ATRC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| W3.org | no error | failed | passed | conditional pass WCAG 2.0 L2 |
| WAI | no error | failed | passed | fail WCAG 2.0 L2 |
| UniSA | 1 error | failed | passed | conditional pass WCAG 2.0 L2 |
| UCLA ATS | no error | failed | passed | fail WCAG 2.0 L2 |
My short summary:
- Something wrong with Cynthia Says (WCAG validator)[?]; updated May 17, 2008: I guess it’s fixed now..or I was wrong..
- University should have a commitment for this.
- Web accessibility needs human evaluation.
- Dani Iswara - Indonesia.
Last updated: Sunday, May 18, 2008 at 10:02 pm
Taken from: Comparison of Web Accessibility by Dani Iswara (Dani Iswara .Net).












1 Trackback(s)
Top
Previous: Bloglines Kesehatan dikelola Kolektif
Next: Google PageRank 0 to 5 in 2 Months