W3C Validator updated to version 0.8.3
Posted: August 14, 2008 at 15:00:08 by Dani Iswara. Words count: 334.
Last updated: August 14, 2008 at 20:01:08.
From their weblog, Markup Validator Updated, finally I know the reason why they put the warning down for X/HTML 1.1 validation:
- Bug Fix: in version 0.8.2, revalidation of an uploaded file was broken (missing markup in the HTML form)
- Updates: Added support for XHTML Basic 1.1, XHTML Mobile Profiles (1.0, 1.1 and 1.2) and the historical HTML i18n
- Bug Fix: the validator won't override a given document type with itself
- Conformance: The validator now warns about inconsistent public/system identifiers combinations
- API: The custom HTTP headers in validator responses now also include the number of warnings
- Experimental Feature: added the new option to send specific Accept-Charset and User-Agent headers, in addition to Accept and Accept-Language in version 0.8.2.
- Experimental Feature: the validator can output its results as JSON.
- Documentation: Some documentation updates
- Development: New automated support and regression test suite
When checking one resource set up with the Accept hack for XHTML, the validator would be served content as text/html, and, since that is not supposed to happen, the validator would yield a warning stating, in essence "are you certain you really want to serve XHTML 1.1 content as text/html?"Caused by users request, so they said:
It may have been a mere warning, but it made a lot, lot, lot of people anxious and upset. So, by popular demand – and also because the XHTML working group are preparing a revised note on XHTML and media types − the warning is gone.Validome.org is still as strict as ever. I guest I have to do an update to my Indonesian list -- web compilation of web standard based on W3C (X/HTML & CSS) and ATRC (accessibility checker), Situs Indonesia Penganut Standar Web (Dani Iswara .Net). But I can't edit that old post due to random error message:
Fatal error: Maximum execution time of 30 seconds exceeded in /home/…/public_html/wp-includes/wp-diff.php on line …Dani Iswara, mail me: [myfirstnamelastname]@gmail.com.
Comment by sawali tuhusetya on August 15, 2008 at 02:44:50
using Flock 1.2.4 on Windows XP
wah, baru saja belajar bahasa CSS dan html, ternyata w3c sudah me-release versi terbaru. saya sering mencoba utk menguji validitas css dan html-nya, pak dani. kayaknya sudah ndak ada yang error maupun dapat peringatan. tapi saya masih kesulitan utk memperbaiki validitas feed-nya. belum tahu gimana caranya. makasih infonya, pak.
Comment by escoret on August 15, 2008 at 17:56:31
using Firefox 2.0.0.14 on Windows XP
ini mbahas opo tho..????
Comment by ammadis on August 16, 2008 at 22:17:47
using Firefox 2.0.0.1 on Windows XP
Two days ago. I try to visited this blog...but I can't to opened. What happen with your blog, Pak Dani...?
Ufh, I don't familiar with this topic...!
Comment by dani on August 17, 2008 at 07:15:10
using Firefox 3.0.1 on Gentoo
- sawali tuhusetya:
pak sawali emang tangguh.. :) gak mudah nyerah..
utk validasi feed-nya tinggal ngikuti pesan kesalahan yg ada, mis. mengikuti standar penulisan
language(mis en-us; bawaan wp sptnya ngga valid??)..penggunaan tag
scriptdi iklan sptnya emang agak susah pak.. :)tp kl sebagian besar pembaca feed masi bs menerima dgn baik, sptnya tdk terlalu bermasalah..
- escoret:
iki kebudayaan tribal model web :D
- ammadis:
yup it was a temporary server problem
Comment by Anton Sulistiyono on August 26, 2008 at 05:17:36
using Firefox 3.0.1 on Windows XP
Makasih mas sarannya.. Mas saya mau tanya. Penggunaan tag yang baik itu gimana mas? Apakah berisi satu phrase atau satu kata. dan sebenarnya apa fungsi tag tersebut?
Terima kasih...
Satu lagi mas.. Cicipi blg baru saya yach,, :D
Comment by dani on August 26, 2008 at 07:17:21
using Firefox 3.0.1 on Gentoo
- Anton Sulistiyono:
[OOT] itu maksudnya tag yg di tiap posting ya..waduh saya ngga perhatian ke tag itu..tp tag bs diatur biar ke-index mesin pencari kan..dgn risiko duplikasi konten ya..cmiiw
Comment by antonsulistiyono on August 26, 2008 at 14:23:37
using Firefox 3.0.1 on Windows XP
Mas saya mau share lagi. Tolong saya ya. Mas dulu khan saya pakai tag asal asalan. Semua tag saya yang judulnya hampir 180-an dan berisi hampir sama dengan judul kategory dan judul postingnya. Di disitemap saya hampir terdapat 300 link tapi yang keindex google hanya 50 link-an, dan pada dashboard - google webmaster katanya isinya sama semua. Saat itu juga setiap harinya hampir 100 pengunjungan yang datang.
Saya berubah ikiran akhirnya saya membuang semua tag saya. 1 hari 2 hari visitor saya meningkat pesat dan itu karena google. setelah dua hari itu visitor saya hilang semua mas. Dikarenakan google melorotkan peringkat saya.
Padahal site yang keindx google sekarang adalah 315 link-an.
Tolong dong mas solusinya. site saya free-friendster.com
Terima kasih
Comment by dani on August 27, 2008 at 06:58:32
using Firefox 3.0.1 on Gentoo
- antonsulistiyono:
[OOT] waduh..kl dijadiin postingan seru juga nih..apa mungkin tag,kategori,archive,page dll yg dirasa ngga perlu diindex google dimasukin robots.txt aja ya..cmiiw
Comment by anton on August 28, 2008 at 17:18:53
using Firefox 3.0.1 on Windows XP
Berarti ngga perlu dimasukin sitemap.xml dan pada robot.txt dibuat allow:tag, category page dan archive mas?
Dan sitemap.xml itu hanya dimasukkin link link posting kita mas aja mas..
Tolong dong mas...
Terima kasih
Comment by anton on August 28, 2008 at 17:21:57
using Firefox 3.0.1 on Windows XP
satu lagi mas, yang dimaksud Priority dan Change Frequency
dan sitemap.xml itu apa mas? Terima kasih..
Dan hal Priority dan Change Frequency yang baik itu gimana?
Terima kasih..
Comment by dani on August 28, 2008 at 20:27:39
using Firefox 3.0.1 on Gentoo
- anton:
utk yg di robots.txt di-disallow kl ngga mau ter-index..
satu lagi mas, yang dimaksud Priority dan Change Frequency
sitemap.xml kl ngga salah format standar utk ngabarin mesin pencari tiap ada perubahan di halaman web..
saya kayaknya masi pake default (plugin google sitemap wp)..
cb konfirmasi jg dg webmaster tools punya google mas..
Comment by Anton Sulistiyono on August 29, 2008 at 07:56:30
using Firefox 3.0.1 on Windows XP
Ya mas tak coba,e dulu. Terima kasih saran dan informasinya