Not Sure about Web Accessibility
Posted: June 20, 2009 at 23:42:56 by Dani Iswara. Words count: 85.
Last updated: August 1, 2009 at 19:18:15.
Just unessential weblog
Physician note of web, blog, Internet, health, Medical Informatics, Consumer Health Informatics, and GNU/Linux.
Posted: June 20, 2009 at 23:42:56 by Dani Iswara. Words count: 85.
Last updated: August 1, 2009 at 19:18:15.
You are free to share (copy, distribute, transmit) & adapt this blog post under the similar license (Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported; CCA-NC-SA 3.0 Unported). Please put these links on your copy:
Taken from: Not Sure about Web Accessibility by Dani Iswara.
You may also read list of most popular posts and most popular tags of Dani Iswara .Net.
Sorry, for some reasons (sometimes due to sp*ms attack), the comment form is closed at this time. If You have any suggestions, please contact me. Thank you.
Return to TOP
›› Older entries: Mengapa Validasi HTML?
‹‹ Newer entries: Validasi HTML, Kualitas Web, dan Conformance
Comment by riesurya on August 2, 2009 at 20:32:04
using Firefox 3.0.1 on Windows XP
temuan menarik Mas Dani. Kayaknya kalo diulas lebih lanjut tambah menarik nih :)
Comment by Dani Iswara on August 3, 2009 at 04:38:40
using Firefox 3.5.1 on Gentoo
riesurya,
memang hanya penekanan seputar:
- tidak ada garansi
- SEO hanya sebagian aksesibilitas web
- investasi kemanusiaan :)
Comment by Cahya on August 3, 2009 at 08:22:54
using Firefox 3.5.1 on Windows Vista
Well, I am not sure, but one think that sure for me is I am still not sure... :D
Moreover I'm not sure if there anyone would find any interest on my pages, ha ha ha :))
Comment by ganda on August 3, 2009 at 11:35:29
using Internet Explorer 8.0 on Windows XP
I'll check first.
Comment by Dani Iswara on August 4, 2009 at 07:06:16
using Firefox 3.5.1 on Gentoo
Cahya,
do you really need (care about) readers? :D
Comment by Dani Iswara on August 4, 2009 at 07:08:28
using Firefox 3.5.1 on Gentoo
ganda,
someone said SEO/SEM first for the faster effect.
Comment by Cahya on August 4, 2009 at 08:36:50
using Firefox 3.5.1 on Windows Vista
Well..., its Red-A, ha ha, remembering me that comercial breaks on TV... :D
The firts issue may be all about expressing something freely, but the second in the line all about blogging is sharing (except close the blog and make it private).
Its just my feeling or something else I don't really understand, when come to firts think, I became careless and wrote as many as it could happen. But the next line give me a sense that I just can't become careless if I wanna share something.
Gezzz, it is the "Simalakama" :D
Comment by ganda on August 4, 2009 at 14:01:01
using Internet Explorer 8.0 on Windows XP
why?
Comment by Dani Iswara on August 4, 2009 at 16:36:26
using Firefox 3.5.1 on Gentoo
ganda,
for the targeted users. they might not need e.g. mobile and blind users.
in some countries, for disabled people, there are accessibility rules/laws.
Comment by Dani Iswara on August 4, 2009 at 17:06:03
using Firefox 3.5.1 on Gentoo
Cahya,
then, theoretically, try to give them what they want. find the correct crowds. connected with people. :)
Comment by ganda on August 4, 2009 at 17:18:14
using Internet Explorer 8.0 on Windows XP
IC IC... then accessibility is not first priority right? I think it is for a kind of commercial site, not a personal one. cmiiw
Comment by Dani Iswara on August 4, 2009 at 21:40:05
using Firefox 3.5.1 on Gentoo
ganda,
yup, I think e-commerce sites need usability and SEO/SEM more often rather than universal accessibility.
Comment by ganda on August 5, 2009 at 12:12:18
using Google Chrome 2.0.172.39 on Windows XP
can you explain more about SEM? Its new for me.
Comment by Dani Iswara on August 6, 2009 at 03:25:43
using Firefox 3.5.1 on Gentoo
ganda,
sorry, find it on the Internet, I'm not in that field. :)
Comment by abbie on August 8, 2009 at 10:48:28
using Firefox 2.0.0.3 on Windows XP
RNID says it's for deaf and hard of hearing people.
Sorry, but I still don't get it clearer.
Aren't they still able to WATCH and READ sites' content?
[RNIB.org.uk gives me 502 bad gateway..]
Comment by abbie on August 8, 2009 at 11:05:23
using Firefox 2.0.0.3 on Windows XP
Reply to my own comment. :D
Mas Dani, do you think they have misspelled the URL on http://www.rnidteaser.co.uk/page4.html? It said rnib.org.uk.
Should it be rnid.org.uk? This one works well..
Comment by Dani Iswara on August 8, 2009 at 11:18:04
using Firefox 3.5.2 on Gentoo
abbie,
they are deaf people. so multimedia web-based application should be accessible too, right?
Google and other search engines do not have eyes, ears and hands too, right? Just like disabled people. :)
Comment by nara on August 8, 2009 at 11:19:42
using Firefox 3.5 on Windows Vista
i'm still learning until now doc :)
Comment by Dani Iswara on August 8, 2009 at 11:19:55
using Firefox 3.5.2 on Gentoo
abbie,
yes, they have a plan to move to a new web site soon.
Comment by abbie on August 11, 2009 at 19:46:54
using Firefox 3.0.13 on Windows XP
Ah.. I see the idea.
a lil bit. ;)
Comment by ganda on August 20, 2009 at 09:20:27
using Internet Explorer 8.0 on Windows XP
for adobe flash/flex application, they have accessibility feature on the builder. But I am not test it yet. I wonder how screen reader scan and reat it.
Comment by dani on August 21, 2009 at 02:41:35
using Firefox 3.5.2 on Gentoo
ganda,
ya I heard that feature. but I am on Linux.
Comment by ganda on August 24, 2009 at 10:51:45
using Internet Explorer 8.0 on Windows XP
Linux do have Adobe Flash Player, don't it?
Comment by Dani Iswara on August 24, 2009 at 11:24:02
using Firefox 3.0.13 on Ubuntu 9.04
ganda,
yes, linux has a flashplugin-nonfree package.
Comment by tank on August 25, 2009 at 14:40:42
using Firefox 3.5.2 on Windows XP
pakai bahasa indo please ditranslate